Polls apart! Political, research and ethical lessons from UK pressure groups' use of opinion polls

Nancarrow, Clive, Evans, Martin John and Pallister, John Gordon 2003. Polls apart! Political, research and ethical lessons from UK pressure groups' use of opinion polls. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8 (2) , pp. 181-193. 10.1002/nvsm.211

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Pressure groups use opinion polls to help further political agendas, as in the case of hunting with dogs. The authors evaluate the two types of poll that have featured in the campaigning: ‘scientific’ (representative) polls and ‘straw’ polls. The shortcomings of straw polls are well known and the new problem of ‘piling in’ where pressure groups direct their supporters to such polls is described, raising a number of potential ethical issues. The apparent discrepancy in ‘scientific’ opinion polls commissioned by the two sides of the debate is examined and an attempt to reconcile the differences is made. The authors' observations raise questions about the value and limitations of polling as well as technical and ethical issues the polling industry and professional bodies need to address.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Business (Including Economics)
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Publisher:	Wiley Blackwell
ISSN:	1465-4520
Last Modified:	19 Mar 2016 23:10
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/41226

Citation Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item