Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work?

Anthony, Denis, Papanikolaou, Panos Panagiotis, Parboteeah, Sam and Saleh, Mohammad 2010. Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work? Journal of Tissue Viability 19 (4) , pp. 132-136. 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.11.006

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Risk assessment scales are widely used to measure the risk of pressure ulcers in the clinical area. They have been subject to many validation studies; however these have focused on the predictive ability of the scales. We have conducted several studies that consider the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. We have reviewed these and revisited the data in some cases to conduct additional tests of validity presented for the first time in this paper. Based on these results, and a review of the literature, we have come to the conclusion that while the scales are probably reliable, and do assess risk: 1.Many of the components of risk assessment scales are not predictive of pressure ulcers 2.There are other variables that are routinely available to clinicians that give additional predictive power 3.The importance of components is not accurately reflected by their range of values 4.Components are correlated and some components may be removed with no loss of predictive power 5.There is no evidence the use of risk assessment scales reduces pressure ulcer incidence The complexity of risk assessment scales does not appear to be warranted. There is evidence that clinical judgment is as effective in assessing risk as risk assessment scales. Reduction in pressure ulcer incidence after implementation of risk assessment tools is likely to be an example of the Hawthorn effect. We believe risk assessment scales are useful research tools, but may not be useful in clinical practice.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Healthcare Sciences
Subjects:	R Medicine > RT Nursing
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Pressure ulcers; Risk assessment
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0965-206X
Related URLs:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...
Last Modified:	09 Jan 2018 16:11
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/15211

Citation Data

Cited 46 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item