|Horlick-Jones, Thomas Edward, Walls, John, Rowe, Gene, Pidgeon, Nicholas Frank, Poortinga, Wouter and O'Riordan, Tim 2006. On evaluating the GM Nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain. New Genetics and Society 25 (3) , pp. 265-288. 10.1080/14636770601032858|
The public debate about GM crops that took place in Britain in 2002–03 was an unprecedented experiment for the UK in public engagement. The Government, which sponsored the exercise, made a pledge: to take into account lay perspectives, as well as the views of its expert advisers, when making a decision about the possible commercialisation of this controversial technology. As officially accredited but independent evaluators of the debate, we were given unique behind-the-scenes access to the organisation and execution of the debate process. In this paper we report on our findings, which reveal a debate process that, whilst innovative, suffered from a number of important flaws: in terms of both design and implementation. These shortcomings in part reflect constraints on time and budget, and the context of political pressure in which the debate took place. However, they also demonstrated a lack of design knowledge and availability of appropriate expertise: matters with an important bearing on future plans for such initiatives.
Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
|Publisher:||Taylor and Francis|
|Last Modified:||05 Jan 2017 02:46|
Cited 32 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar
Cited 28 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Cited 16 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.
Actions (repository staff only)