Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Scoring posters at scientific meetings: first impressions count

Smith, Philip E. M., Fuller, G. and Dunstan, Frank David John 2004. Scoring posters at scientific meetings: first impressions count. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 97 (7) , pp. 340-341. 10.1258/jrsm.97.7.340

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Many specialist societies present ‘best poster’ prizes, yet without generally agreed assessment methods. 31 posters at a neurology meeting were divided randomly into two sets; 14 neurologists, randomized into two groups, were each assigned one poster set. They ‘quick scored’ the first half, viewing posters for 10-15 seconds, and ‘detailed scored’ the others. 11 administrators and pharmaceutical representatives quick scored all posters. Neurologists' quick score ranking correlated highly (r=0.75) with other neurologists' detailed score ranking, and identified four of their six top-ranked posters. Correlations were strongest for presentation (r=0.65), message (r=0.65) and star-quality (r=0.64), but weak for facts (r=0.09), originality (r=0.15) or science (r=0.02). Non-neurologists could not identify the posters ranked highest by neurologists. We conclude that quick ranking by specialists can efficiently identify the best posters for more detailed assessment. On this basis we offer poster-scoring guidelines for use at scientific meetings.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI)
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Publisher: Royal Society of Medicine Press
ISSN: 0141-0768
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 06:41
URI: http://orca-mwe.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/63653

Citation Data

Cited 22 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 15 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item