Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

An operant serial implicit learning task (SILT) in rats: Task acquisition, performance and the effects of striatal lesions

Jay, Julia R. and Dunnett, Stephen Bruce 2007. An operant serial implicit learning task (SILT) in rats: Task acquisition, performance and the effects of striatal lesions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 163 (2) , pp. 235-244. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.008

Full text not available from this repository.


We describe the serial implicit learning task (SILT), a novel test for assessing implicit and procedural learning in rodents, and have used the task to test whether striatal lesions disrupt the speed and accuracy of responding to stimulus–response (S–R) sequences that may be either predictable or unpredictable. In this task, the rats must learn to respond to two consecutive stimulus lights, S1 and S2, which may occur on each trial in any of five alternative response locations, for food reward. For two of the S1 locations, the location of the subsequent S2 is predictable, whereas for the other three S1 locations, the location of S2 is unpredictable and can appear with equal probability in any of the other four locations (i.e. any open hole other than S1 itself). All rats learned to make the serial responses rapidly and accurately. Effective implicit learning was demonstrated by there being a significant advantage in both speed and accuracy in responding to predictable than to unpredictable S2 stimuli. Following quinolinic acid lesions of the medial or lateral striatum, the lesioned rats showed significantly reduced accuracy and increased latencies in responding to both S1 and S2, although (contrary to initial hypothesis) the benefits of predictability of S2 were retained. These data establish a novel and efficient operant test for implicit learning in the rat.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Biosciences
ISSN: 0165-0270
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 06:34

Citation Data

Cited 21 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 21 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item