Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery

Goslin, Ross Anthony and Elhassan, Hassan A. 2013. Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery. The Laryngoscope 123 (7) , pp. 1626-1631. 10.1002/lary.23773

Full text not available from this repository.


Objectives/Hypothesis: To assess the quality, accessibility, usability, reliability, and readability of Web sites that provide information on common ear, nose, and throat conditions. Study Design: Several standardized and validated appraisal instruments and questionnaires designed to rate Web sites providing online health information were used to evaluate the content of online ear, nose, and throat health information. Methods: The terms “cholesteatoma,” “sinusitis,” “tonsillitis,” “acute otitis media,” “epistaxis,” and “quinsy” (peritonsillar abscess), representing six common ear, nose, and throat conditions, were entered separately into the Internet search engine Google. Web sites satisfying the inclusion criteria from the first 30 results of each search were evaluated for content quality using the DISCERN rating instrument, for accessibility, usability, and reliability using the LIDA rating instrument, and for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease score. Results: Of the 180 Web sites identified, 124 (68.9%) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mean overall DISCERN score for quality was “poor,” at 39/80 (range, 16–70). The DISCERN instrument rated 2 (1.6%) Web sites as “excellent,” 14 (11.3%) as “good,” 40 (32.3%) as “fair,” 38 (30.6%) as “poor,” and 30 (24.2%) as “very poor.” The mean overall LIDA score for accessibility, usability, and reliability was “moderate,” at 114/165 (69.3%; range, 61–142). The mean Flesch Reading Ease score for the readability of Web sites was 42.3/100 (range, 10.7–71.9). Conclusions: The use of validated instruments is necessary to reduce the risks from patients accessing misinformation. They can guide health care professionals with their role in directing patients to high-quality sources of information and endorsing Web sites that meet high standards.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: R Medicine > RF Otorhinolaryngology
Uncontrolled Keywords: Health care information; quality; accessibility; usability; reliability; readability; DISCERN; LIDA; Flesch Reading Ease
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 0023-852X
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2016 23:42

Citation Data

Cited 33 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 31 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item