|Corner, Adam J. and Pidgeon, Nicholas Frank 2015. Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change 130 (3) , pp. 425-438. 10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6|
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (325kB) | Preview
The linguistic frames used to describe new areas of science and technology can have a powerful effect on the way that those technologies are perceived by the general public. As geoengineering continues to attract scholarly and policy interest, a number of frames have emerged in the scientific, political and media discourse. In the current paper, we provide an empirical test of one of the most prevalent framing devices: describing geoengineering technologies by analogy to natural processes. In an online experiment with members of the UK public, participants who read a description of geoengineering technologies as analogous to natural processes were more likely to support geoengineering as a response to climate change. In addition, participants’ views about the relationship between geoengineering and nature strongly predicted support for geoengineering. Our findings suggest that communicators should be cautious when using natural analogies to communicate about geoengineering with the general public, as frame choice is likely to influence public attitudes and potentially convey undue positivity.
|Last Modified:||20 Apr 2017 03:33|
Cited 3 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar
Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Cited 1 time in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.
Actions (repository staff only)