Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Magnetic order in a spin-1/2 interpolating square-triangle Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Bishop, R. F., Li, P. H. Y., Farnell, Damian J. J. and Campbell, C. E. 2009. Magnetic order in a spin-1/2 interpolating square-triangle Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 79 (17) , 174405. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.174405

Full text not available from this repository.


Using the coupled cluster method (CCM) we study the zero-temperature phase diagram of a spin-half Heisenberg antiferromagnet (HAF), the so-called J1–J′2 model, defined on an anisotropic two-dimensional lattice. With respect to an underlying square-lattice geometry the model contains antiferromagnetic (J1>0) bonds between nearest neighbors and competing (J′2>0) bonds between next-nearest neighbors across only one of the diagonals of each square plaquette, the same diagonal in every square. Considered on an equivalent triangular-lattice geometry the model may be regarded as having two sorts of nearest-neighbor bonds, with J′2≡κJ1 bonds along parallel chains and J1 bonds providing an interchain coupling. Each triangular plaquette thus contains two J1 bonds and one J′2 bond. Hence, the model interpolates between a spin-half HAF on the square lattice at one extreme (κ=0) and a set of decoupled spin-half chains at the other (κ→∞), with the spin-half HAF on the triangular lattice in between at κ=1. We use a Néel state, a helical state, and a collinear stripe-ordered state as separate starting model states for the CCM calculations that we carry out to high orders of approximation (up to eighth order, n=8, in the localized subsystem set of approximations, LSUBn). The interplay between quantum fluctuations, magnetic frustration, and varying dimensionality leads to an interesting quantum phase diagram. We find strong evidence that quantum fluctuations favor a weakly first-order or possibly second-order transition from Néel order to a helical state at a first critical point at κc1=0.80±0.01 by contrast with the corresponding second-order transition between the equivalent classical states at κcl=0.5. We also find strong evidence for a second critical point at κc2=1.8±0.4 where a first-order transition occurs, this time from the helical phase to a collinear stripe-ordered phase. This latter result provides quantitative verification of a recent qualitative prediction of and Starykh and Balents [Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 077205 (2007)] based on a renormalization group analysis of the J1–J′2 model that did not, however, evaluate the corresponding critical point.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Dentistry
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
Publisher: American Physical Society
ISSN: 1098-0121
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 06:23

Citation Data

Cited 56 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 63 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item