Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Framing risk: nanotechnologies in the news

Allan, Stuart, Anderson, Alison and Petersen, Alan 2010. Framing risk: nanotechnologies in the news. Journal of Risk Research 13 (1) , pp. 29-44. 10.1080/13669870903135847

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The concept of ‘framing’ is being increasingly recognised as a useful means of characterising the social relations of representation shaping the news reporting of science and risk. In theoretical terms, framing is often described as a discursive strategy utilised by journalists to define the nature of a particular event, a complex process with important implications for how certain occurrences are selected as newsworthy, the conventions guiding the ways in which they are reported and the possible consequences for influencing public perceptions. Focusing on the news reporting of nanotechnologies, this paper explores the relative advantages and limitations of ‘framing’. It draws on data from two UK studies, one examining news media production of nanotechnologies and the other examining scientists’ and policy‐makers’ views on the future applications of nanotechnologies. We highlight the key role played by scientists as news sources and hence potentially influential actors in issue definition. We argue that risk researchers need to pay closer attention to the behind‐the‐scenes politics of framing, whereby competing claims‐makers seek to establish their own particular interpretation of the situation.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords: news production; framing; news sources; scientists; journalists; nanotechnologies
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 1366-9877
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 06:12
URI: http://orca-mwe.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/57238

Citation Data

Cited 33 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 26 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 14 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item