Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Intergroup Emotions: More than the Sum of the Parts

Spears, Russell, Leach, Colin Wayne, van Zomeren, Martijn, Ispas, Alexa, Sweetman, Joseph and Tausch, Nicole 2011. Intergroup Emotions: More than the Sum of the Parts. In: Nyklíček, I., Vingerhoets, A. and Zeelenberg, M. eds. Emotion Regulation and Well-Being, New York: Springer, pp. 121-145. (10.1007/978-1-4419-6953-8_8)

Full text not available from this repository.


In this chapter we make the case that recent research on intergroup emotions enriches both the intergroup relations and emotions domains in a way that is more than the sum of its parts. Focusing on research from our own lab’ we illustrate our argument with evidence for the heuristic value of a group emotions approach to prejudice and discrimination, and to social action and social change on the part of disadvantaged groups. In terms of prejudice and discrimination, a group emotion based analysis helps us to understand the specificity and also extreme forms that (emotional) prejudice can take. We focus on the particularly powerful combination of anger and fear, and the explicitly malicious emotion of intergroup schadenfreude. As well as helping to explain examples of negative intergroup behavior, group emotions can also help to explain social change resulting from group inequalities. We review work from a dual path model of collective action and social change that incorporates efficacy and emotions-focused coping routes to social change. Overall, there is strong evidence that group emotions are functional (if not always prosocial) in regulating behavior at the group level by validating shared experience in the group that becomes a launch-pad for action.

Item Type: Book Section
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 9781441969521
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 10 Oct 2017 14:51

Citation Data

Cited 4 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 9 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item