Regret and responsibility resolved? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly's (2000) conclusions

Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W. and Manstead, Antony Stephen Reid ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7540-2096 2000. Regret and responsibility resolved? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly's (2000) conclusions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81 (1) , pp. 143-154. 10.1006/obhd.1999.2865

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

T. Connolly, L. D. Ordo;aan;atez, and R. Coughlan (1997, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 73–85) argued, on the basis of 5 experiments, that regret need not be related to a sense of responsibility for the regretted outcome. We (M. Zeelenberg, W. W. van Dijk, & A. S. R. Manstead, 1998, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254–272) showed in 2 experiments that this conclusion was premature, because it was based on an indirect measure of regret (i.e., overall happiness with the decision outcome). When regret was directly measured, the predicted effects of responsibility were found. L. D. Ordo;aan;atez and T. Connolly (2000, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 132–142) replicated our findings in 2 experiments. Based on their findings they arrived at 4 conclusions. In this rejoinder we first discuss Ordóñez and Connolly's new studies and we then discuss the validity of their 4 conclusions.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0749-5978
Last Modified:	21 Oct 2022 08:51
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/34615

Citation Data

Cited 76 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item