|Pidgeon, Nicholas Frank, Harthorn, Barbara and Satterfield, Terre 2011. Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis 31 (11) , pp. 1694-1700. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x|
Nanotechnology involves the fabrication, manipulation, and control of materials at the atomic level and may also bring novel uncertainties and risks. Potential parallels with other controversial technologies mean there is a need to develop a comprehensive understanding of processes of public perception of nanotechnology uncertainties, risks, and benefits, alongside related communication issues. Study of perceptions, at so early a stage in the development trajectory of a technology, is probably unique in the risk perception and communication field. As such it also brings new methodological and conceptual challenges. These include: dealing with the inherent diversity of the nanotechnology field itself; the unfamiliar and intangible nature of the concept, with few analogies to anchor mental models or risk perceptions; and the ethical and value questions underlying many nanotechnology debates. Utilizing the lens of social amplification of risk, and drawing upon the various contributions to this special issue of Risk Analysis on Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication, nanotechnology may at present be an attenuated hazard. The generic idea of “upstream public engagement” for emerging technologies such as nanotechnology is also discussed, alongside its importance for future work with emerging technologies in the risk communication field.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
|Last Modified:||15 Nov 2013 10:19|
Cited 31 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar
Cited 26 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Cited 17 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.
Actions (repository staff only)