Postscript: All together now: “Three heads are better than four”

Hahn, Ulrike and Warren, Paul Antony 2010. Postscript: All together now: “Three heads are better than four”. Psychological Review 117 (2) , p. 711. 10.1037/0033-295X.117.2.711

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In this postscript the authors summarize where Sun, Tweney, and Wang (see record 2010-06891-015) now agree with their original analysis and where differences of opinion remain. Sun et al.’s (see record 2010-06891-018) postscript contrasted two positions, one emphasizing the “limited and finite nature of people’s experience” and one emphasizing the “overlapping” of local sequences. To the current authors' mind, there should be no such contrast: Both aspects are necessary for the results of their initial article. Basically, neither component seems interesting without the other. Both points were part of the original authors' argument for the subtlety of the gambler’s fallacy. Possibly, Sun et al. still do not find that argument persuasive, but it seems they now consider those two basic points sound.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	1939-1471
Last Modified:	07 Jul 2023 06:23
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/30482

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item