Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

High incidence of defective ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice

Martensson, Mattis, Olsson, Mats, Segall, Bjporn, Fraser, Alan Gordon, Winter, Reidar and Brodin, Lars -Ake. 2009. High incidence of defective ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice. European Journal of Echocardiography 10 (3) , pp. 389-394. 10.1093/ejechocard/jen295

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Aims The objective was to evaluate the function of ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice and thereby estimating the incidence of defective transducers. Methods and results The study comprised a one-time test of 676 transducers from 7 manufacturers which were in daily use in clinical departments at 32 hospitals. They were tested with the Sonora FirstCall Test System; 39.8% exhibited a transducer error. Delamination was detected in 26.5% and break in the cable was detected in 8.4% of the tested transducers. Errors originating from the piezoelectrical elements were unusual. Delamination and short circuit occurred without significant differences between transducers from all tested manufacturers, but the errors break in the cable, weak and dead element showed a statistically significant higher frequency in transducers from certain manufacturers. Conclusion The high error frequency and the risk for incorrect medical decisions when using a defective transducer indicate an urgent need for increased testing of the transducers in clinical departments.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Ultrasound; Transducer; probe test; defect; error
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1525-2167
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 03:48
URI: http://orca-mwe.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/27122

Citation Data

Cited 36 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 40 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item