Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview

Suliman, Sharain, Van Den Heuvel, leigh, Suryapranata, Alexandra, Bisson, Jonathan and Soraya, Seedat 2019. Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview. Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 , 15. 10.1186/s41073-019-0074-6

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (869kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Although a large number of clinical trials on interventions demonstrating efficacy (or lack thereof) are conducted annually, much of this evidence is not accessible to scientists and clinicians. Objectives We aimed to determine the publication rate of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) trials that have been registered in clinical trial registries, and the factors associated with publication. Methods Trials, completed on January 15, 2015, were identified via the US National Institutes of Health clinical trials registry, the European Union Clinical Trials Register and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. A systematic search for publications (published by the end of March 2018) related to each of the registered trials were then performed. Results Four hundred and thirty-eight of 1982 potentially eligible trials were included. Only 34% of interventional trials were registered prior to initiation, 9% were registered within 2 months of starting and 20% after trial completion. Of the 438 included trials, 72% had generated peer-reviewed publications, while an additional 7% had disseminated results in some other form (such as on the trial database), 26 months after trial completion. Randomisation of a trial was the only factor individually associated with publication, in logistic regression analysis (p < 0.001). Intervention type, university as sponsor and study registration prior to completion were factors that influenced the time to publication, using Cox regression (p < 0.001). Conclusions This study underscores the importance of timely and accurate publication and dissemination of trial results, in order to avoid the potential waste of resources and to ensure research integrity and patient safety. We suggest that authors and journal editors adhere to conditions set out by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and that more diligent data sharing is encouraged through prospective trial registration and trial reporting websites.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics (CNGG)
Publisher: BMC
ISSN: 2058-8615
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 8 July 2019
Date of Acceptance: 1 July 2019
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2019 10:42
URI: http://orca-mwe.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/124031

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics