Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Treatment strategies for women with WHO group II anovulation: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Wang, Rui, Kim, Bobae V., van Wely, Madelon, Johnson, Neil P., Costello, Michael F., Zhang, Hanwang, Ng, Ernest Hung Yu, Legro, Richard S., Bhattacharya, Siladitya ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4588-356X, Norman, Robert J. and Mol, Ben Willem J. 2017. Treatment strategies for women with WHO group II anovulation: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 356 , j138. 10.1136/bmj.j138

[thumbnail of bmj.j138.full.pd.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (396kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness of alternative first line treatment options for women with WHO group II anovulation wishing to conceive. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase, up to 11 April 2016. Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing eight ovulation induction treatments in women with WHO group II anovulation: clomiphene, letrozole, metformin, clomiphene and metformin combined, tamoxifen, gonadotropins, laparoscopic ovarian drilling, and placebo or no treatment. Study quality was measured on the basis of the methodology and categories described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Pregnancy, defined preferably as clinical pregnancy, was the primary outcome; live birth, ovulation, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy were secondary outcomes. Results Of 2631 titles and abstracts initially identified, 57 trials reporting on 8082 women were included. All pharmacological treatments were superior to placebo or no intervention in terms of pregnancy and ovulation. Compared with clomiphene alone, both letrozole and the combination of clomiphene and metformin showed higher pregnancy rates (odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 2.00; 1.81, 1.35 to 2.42; respectively) and ovulation rates (1.99, 1.38 to 2.87; 1.55, 1.02 to 2.36; respectively). Letrozole led to higher live birth rates when compared with clomiphene alone (1.67, 1.11 to 2.49). Both letrozole and metformin led to lower multiple pregnancy rates compared with clomiphene alone (0.46, 0.23 to 0.92; 0.22, 0.05 to 0.92; respectively). Conclusions In women with WHO group II anovulation, letrozole and the combination of clomiphene and metformin are superior to clomiphene alone in terms of ovulation and pregnancy. Compared with clomiphene alone, letrozole is the only treatment showing a significantly higher rate of live birth.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Additional Information: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN: 0959-8138
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 28 August 2018
Date of Acceptance: 29 December 2016
Last Modified: 05 May 2023 11:47
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/114408

Citation Data

Cited 69 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics