Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Minimising biases in expert elicitations to inform environmental management: Case studies from environmental flows in Australia

de Little, Siobhan C., Casas-Mulet, Roser, Patulny, Lisa, Wand, Joanna, Miller, Kimberly A., Fidler, Fiona, Stewardson, Michael J. and Webb, J. Angus 2018. Minimising biases in expert elicitations to inform environmental management: Case studies from environmental flows in Australia. Environmental Modelling & Software 100 , pp. 146-158. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.020

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Environmental managers often do not have sufficient empirical data to inform decisions, and instead must rely on expert predictions. However, the informal methods often used to gather expert opinions are prone to cognitive and motivational biases. We developed a structured elicitation protocol, where opinions are directly incorporated into Bayesian Network (BBN) models. The 4-stage protocol includes approaches to minimise biases during pre-elicitation, workshop facilitation and output analysis; and results in a fully functional BBN model. We illustrate our protocol using examples from environmental flow management in Australia, presenting models of vegetation responses to changes in riverine flow regimes. The reliance on expert opinion and the contested nature of many environmental management decisions mean that our structured elicitation protocol is potentially of great value for developing robust environmental recommendations. This method also lends itself to effective adaptive management, because the expert-populated ecological response models can be readily updated with field data.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Biosciences
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1364-8152
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 18 December 2017
Date of Acceptance: 9 November 2017
Last Modified: 21 Aug 2019 02:27
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/107630

Citation Data

Cited 16 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item