The medical licensing examination debate

Archer, Julian, Lynn, Nick, Coombes, Lee, Roberts, Martin, Gale, Tom and Regan de Bere, Sam 2016. The medical licensing examination debate. Regulation & Governance 16 (1) 10.1111/rego.12118

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

National licensing examinations are typically large-scale examinations taken early in a career or near the point of graduation, and, importantly, success is required to subsequently be able to practice. They are becoming increasingly popular as a method of quality assurance in the medical workforce, but debate about their contribution to patient safety and the improvement of healthcare outcomes continues. A systematic review of the national licensing examination literature demonstrates that there is disagreement between assessment experts about the strengths and challenges of licensing examinations. This is characterized by a trans-Atlantic divide between the dominance of psychometric reliability assurance in North America and the wider interpretations of validity, to include consequences, in Europe. We conclude that the debate might benefit from refocusing to what a national licensing examination should assess: to achieve a balance between assessing a breadth of skills and the capacity for such skills in practice, and focusing less on reproducibility.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords:	national licensing examination; validity; international medical graduates; testing; assessment.
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:	1748-5983
Date of Acceptance:	26 February 2016
Last Modified:	21 Aug 2017 09:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/103786

Citation Data

Cited 16 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item